openforum

YouTube logo rss logo twitter logo facebook logo flickr logo

 

Archives
Categories

Welcome to OpenForum.  We love plays that start a good conversation and there are many ways and places to have that conversation! This is your one-stop place to join in on the discussions going on about all the shows at Forum.

We'd love for you to participate by commenting on our blog posts but we'd also love to interact with you via Social Media. Please follow us, friend us, like us, link us, and watch us (not necessarily in that order)

For information on our post-show and stand-alone OpenForum discussions, click here.


OpenForum Blog:

MAD FOREST: notes from the dramaturg

Posted on October 11, 2011 in Mad Forest

 

 

 

 

By Mad Forest dramaturg, Hannah Hessel (@hanvnah)

 

From the program for Mad Forest

 

On the plain where Bucharest now stands there used to be “a large forest crossed by small muddy streams…It could only be crossed on foot and was impenetrable for the foreigner who did not know the paths…The horsemen of the steppe were compelled to go round it, and this difficulty, which irked them so, is shown by the name… Teleorman – Mad Forest.”

– A Concise History of Romania 
 
 
The late 1980s were a time of political uprooting in Eastern Europe. Many countries, under Communist rule, were suddenly making changes towards democracy. In many of these places the changes came out of organization and order; the steps can be understood and followed. This was not the case in Romania. In 1989 the revolution took people by surprise. It wasn’t that the people weren’t interested in change, or hadn’t expected it at some point, but the violence, suddenness and bloodiness of the revolt was stunning. It was in that sudden aftermath that playwright Caryl Churchill and director Mark Wing-Davey visited, explored and imaginatively recorded the world they saw.
 
Romania, under Communist rule since the late 1940s, was ruled by Nicolae Ceausescu, the general party secretary. He ruled as a dictator creating harsh rules and a society built around paranoid fear. The party line was one of dedication to Ceausescu, highlighting his love and devotion to the Romanian people. Economically the people were suffering. In the early Eighties Ceausescu had enforced food rationing. The official monthly ration contained just over two pounds of flour, sugar and meat, one pound margarine, and five eggs.  There was never a guarantee that food would be available in the shops.  The unhappiness and oppression of the people existed as a bubbling under the surface. It was as if everyone in the country was waiting and no one was acting. When it did start, it happened suddenly and with such quick rage that it is difficult for historians looking back on it to track. Just a couple of years following the revolution a poll was taken of the Romanian population asking if they felt that the events of December 1989 were indeed a revolution, only 46% felt that it was. A similar poll taken in 1999 had the results at 49%.
 
The atmosphere in Bucharest post-revolution was one of relief and confusion when Churchill, Wing-Davey, a designer and 10 student actors arrived at the end of March 1990.  They listened, questioned, observed and explored the city. On returning Churchill compiled the research and wrote Mad Forest.
 
Comments (10)
Bookmark and Share
nfejbwhr
Posted by cash advance on 05/18/12 | Reply
zyfvaob
Posted by viagra buy online on 05/16/12 | Reply
qulgpc
Posted by Bad Credit Loans on 05/15/12 | Reply
vacoiihj
Posted by viagra on 05/14/12 | Reply
ljruwfz
Posted by personal loans on 05/14/12 | Reply
rhirbxnh
Posted by Cash Advance on 05/12/12 | Reply
mkrsbw
Posted by payday loans on 05/12/12 | Reply
psadosl
Posted by fast cash advance on 05/11/12 | Reply
iaulaq
Posted by cheap mobic on 05/11/12 | Reply

Nike Shox
nike shox rivalry
shox
shox rivalry
nike shox pas cher
shox pas cher


air max pas cher
tn air max pas cher
requin cher
pas cher air max
tn requin
air max tn


TN Requin
Nike TN
Chaussures Nike TN
Nike TN Requin

TN Requin
TN Pas Cher
Nike TN
Nike air max
TN REQUIN
Puma Pas Cher

TN Pas Cher
Nike tn 2012
tn foot locker

TN REQUIN Nike TN Nike Requin Chaussure Requin Air Max Requin TN Pas Cher Puma Pas Cher
Posted by Nike Shox on 05/03/12 | Reply
Add a comment

What does this revolution mean?

Posted on October 10, 2011 in Mad Forest

 

 

by Mad Forest director, Michael Dove (@michaeldove)

(updated, 10/10/2011, 2:37 pm EST)

I'm starting to realize that I've had revolutions on my mind for a really long time, now.

 

In part, it's our current production of Mad Forest, which takes place in Romanian Revolution 1989. Then there was Monday's (Re)Acts performance where 8 artists created short works in reaction to different revolutions throughout history. On top of that, we've had a few major events cross our news channels over the past year: "Arab Spring," the UK riots, and the Occupy Wall Street protests happening in New York and all over the country.

But going back even further, I'm realizing that the term and concept of "revolution" have been fairly central aspects of my life since before adolescence. I grew up in the Shenandoah Valley, Virginia, where you couldn't walk 10 steps without tripping over a Civil War landmark plaque or battleground. Add to that the fact that my parents choose Williamsburg, Virginia as our twice-a-year vacation spot where your head is constantly filled with tales of the British Colonization and the American Revolution. After that, I'm realizing that it was no coincidence that I've found myself in Washington, DC, surrounded by American History relics inspired by our great war against our oppressors. 

So, taking a step back from all of this, I've been asking myself "what does  'revolution' mean, exactly? Are all of these current and historical events related? What part of our human nature causes us to revolt?"

I remember from my Latin class in high school that the word "revolution" is from revolution, "a turn around." It's a distinct and fundamental shift away from a system or an idea. The popular (or even, perhaps, romanticized) notion of a revolution is a populist movement against oppression. Revolution from a destructive tyrant, from a repressive system of social/religious beliefs, or maybe an industrial revolution that changes nearly all aspects of daily life.

Relating this concept to how I view the types of plays I feel are important and the types of stories Forum Theatre is focused on telling, I'm looking at the "what does 'revolution' mean" question in terms of "how we can live together, better." I think, deep down, these events happen when a group of people realize that there HAS to be a better way. A movement that says "We are not being treated the way we feel we should." 

With Mad Forest we have a story about the perception of a revolution that leaves everyone asking "what exactly happened? Who really led this movement?" And while many people wanted the change that revolution promised, what came after was a release of pent-up emotions and feels that became a whole new challenge.

As we look to the futures of Egypt, Libya, and the other Arab Spring revolutions, as we look to the legacies of our own American conflicts, the results of the revolutions discussed in our (Re)Acts night, and as we ponder the outcomes of the Occupy Wall Street movement, we have to constantly ask ourselves how these events can be used for good and how can they bring us together as a society that treats its members more fairly.

-----------------------------------------------------------

 

An Egyptian activist named Mohammed Ezzeldin explained what he saw was the connection between Occupy Wall Street and the protests against Hosni Mubarak.

 

Updates/conributions:

Our friend Ari Roth (@arirothdc), the Artistic Director at Theater J, send me these two news stories that felt relevant to this conversation:


Egyptian Prime Minister Essam Sharaf promises investigation of violence (Washington Post)

 

 

 

Revolution: Egyptians return to Tahrir Square (CBS News)

 

Comments (36)
Bookmark and Share
wvgong
Posted by payday loans Canada on 05/18/12 | Reply
bpgplk
Posted by payday loan on 05/17/12 | Reply
ncmxrw
Posted by quick quid on 05/15/12 | Reply
lktvyekn
Posted by viagra precio on 05/14/12 | Reply
qwxmde
Posted by payday loans in Canada on 05/12/12 | Reply
rbjadv
Posted by naprosyn on 05/10/12 | Reply
nwldgnmr
Posted by nizoral on 05/10/12 | Reply
wqxmejrs
Posted by payday advance on 05/10/12 | Reply
xrsdnsj
Posted by pay day loan on 05/09/12 | Reply
ejkydi
Posted by fast cash advance on 05/05/12 | Reply
hlnlxhh
Posted by payday loan on 05/05/12 | Reply
xhldlsae
Posted by payday loans uk on 05/04/12 | Reply
yoqhqe
Posted by payday Saint Paul on 05/03/12 | Reply
hrnbkiss
Posted by payday Frisco on 05/03/12 | Reply
daugpqa
Posted by payday advance on 05/02/12 | Reply
etpmabe
Posted by payday loans UK on 05/02/12 | Reply
bjdllcm
Posted by online payday on 04/29/12 | Reply
abzunvh
Posted by personal loans on 04/29/12 | Reply
wcclzq
Posted by cialis on 04/27/12 | Reply
hmcecaop
Posted by viagra on 04/27/12 | Reply
pjxpuwof
Posted by pay day loans on 04/26/12 | Reply
73a“Holes” the play was a very exciting experience. While in the threater I was sucked into the story of Stanley Yelnats and his journey to Camp Green Lake. You could just see while watching the play that the actors worked well together, they were in perfect harmony. Even with how impressed I was with the play there was one thing that bothered me. That was the actor Mauricio Suarez, he was very monotone through-out the whole performance.When it came to set deisgn and props they were amazing. I felt like i was actually there with the characters in the hot desert heat digging holes. The flashbacks were my favorite part because of the lighing at the time, the way it made the dirt looking set apear to be grass. All the fights done in the play were good, but not as good as i would have hoped. When it came to were “Stanley” got hit by a shovel, it didnt look as well done as some of the other fight scenes. The costumes were excellent, they really gave the appearance that the boys had been out digging in the dirt, hot, and sweaty.The play was almost like the book except for a few things, like how Twitch wasnt there. Twitch was the one who taught Stanley to hotwire cars so he could steal Mr. Sir’s truck. As the play came to a close I was still stuck in my seat wanting more. When they actors came out for the discussion at the end you could tell how well they got along, like with Nick Abeel, and Mauricio Suarez, they seemed to really be good friends on and off set.Everyone from what I can tell on and off screen did a fantastic job on this showing of “Holes”. I would recommend to anyone I know to come see these actors perform. Great job to all the actors, directors, and all others you did a amazing job on the play. It was an experience that i will never forget.21

Posted by life insurance on 04/25/12 | Reply
iqrzqld
Posted by Cialis on 04/23/12 | Reply
jadwgp
Posted by clomid on 04/23/12 | Reply
qbqbzyqx
Posted by payday loans dallas on 04/20/12 | Reply
szzvgfii
Posted by cheap viagra online on 04/19/12 | Reply
tfzxqgcv
Posted by generic viagra on 04/19/12 | Reply
On a scale of 0-10 with 0 being completely worthless and 10 being superior, my seatmate and I gave “Holes” scores ranging from 4-7 (some parts were better than others), which gives an overall NTW rating: Not The Worst. Even though the play clicked right along with no uncomfortable pauses (good directing), overall the plot too often developed as if the characters were thinking it up as they went along. It is NOT an inspired plot and that woodpecker song is too dumb for words. The casting was good. Nick Abeel from the start was extremely annoying in every way. I just wanted to slap him, which I suspect is the emotion the playwright intended to engender. Mark Goetzinger and Jennifer Johansen always give solid performances and Milicent Wright is magical, a divine talent. (We attend any play that Milicent Wright and Jennifer Johansen, or Rob Johansen, are in, sometimes twice.) Wayne T. Carr–so much presence, just a pleasure to watch him work. All the actors did fine (those delinquent kids must have been good actors, because I found them thoroughly repulsive, wanted to slap them, too). But please, PLEASE tell your young actors that they have to ARTICULATE. They have to make every syllable understandable. You are stage actors, you guys. It’s not TV, not film, not the school cafeteria or mumbling in your sleep, it’s the stage, and many in the audience are over the age of 40, 50, 60 and (gasp) even older. We don’t hear as fast or as well as we used to. We require articulation. Slowing down a teeny-tiny bit would help, but what would help most is to articulate, enunciate, pronounce every syllable. We want to be able to hear and understand. Another magical actor with enormous talent and stage presence–Mauricio Suarez. Wow! That kid is going places. Final word: Not the greatest play. I wouldn’t recommend it, except maybe to a talent scout looking for a good 13-year-old actor, and I certainly hope you never reprise it. But I’m not sorry I saw it. In general it was a fun evening and the refreshments were great. We loved those brownies and meatballs!

Posted by viagra on 04/04/12 | Reply
On a scale of 0-10 with 0 being completely sohtrlews and 10 being superior, my seatmate and I gave Holes scores ranging from 4-7 (some parts were better than others), which gives an overall NTW rating: Not The Worst. Even though the play clicked right along with no uncomfortable pauses (good directing), overall the plot too often developed as if the characters were thinking it up as they went along. It is NOT an inspired plot and that woodpecker song is too dumb for words. The casting was good. Nick Abeel from the start was extremely annoying in every way. I just wanted to slap him, which I suspect is the emotion the playwright intended to engender. Mark Goetzinger and Jennifer Johansen always give solid performances and Milicent Wright is magical, a divine talent. (We attend any play that Milicent Wright and Jennifer Johansen, or Rob Johansen, are in, sometimes twice.) Wayne T. Carr so much presence, just a pleasure to watch him work. All the actors did fine (those delinquent kids must have been good actors, because I found them thoroughly repulsive, wanted to slap them, too). But please, PLEASE tell your young actors that they have to ARTICULATE. They have to make every syllable understandable. You are stage actors, you guys. It's not TV, not film, not the school cafeteria or mumbling in your sleep, it's the stage, and many in the audience are over the age of 40, 50, 60 and (gasp) even older. We don't hear as fast or as well as we used to. We require articulation. Slowing down a teeny-tiny bit would help, but what would help most is to articulate, enunciate, pronounce every syllable. We want to be able to hear and understand. Another magical actor with enormous talent and stage presence Mauricio Suarez. Wow! That kid is going places. Final word: Not the greatest play. I wouldn't recommend it, except maybe to a talent scout looking for a good 13-year-old actor, and I certainly hope you never reprise it. But I'm not sorry I saw it. In general it was a fun evening and the refreshments were great. We loved those brownies and meatballs!
Posted by Muhammad on 03/27/12 | Reply
vyptbmtm
Posted by cialis on 03/15/12 | Reply
nzgdnzp
Posted by Holiday Payday Loans on 03/14/12 | Reply
wbvldsak
Posted by viagra on 03/08/12 | Reply
idicdlpc
Posted by buy viagra on 03/08/12 | Reply
qrecdqx
Posted by cheap viagra on 03/07/12 | Reply
I really enjoy your editorials,thanks for such informative and insightful reading
Posted by ballon bleu de cartier watch on 03/05/12 | Reply
nazfxvl
Posted by No credit check Payday Loans on 03/03/12 | Reply
Add a comment

Creating an OpenForum for MAD FOREST

Posted on September 30, 2011 in Mad Forest

 

By Mad Forest dramaturg, Hannah Hessel (@hanvnah)
 
Following the opening night performance of Mad Forest, the lobby was buzzing with conversation. There’s nothing new about an opening night reception being loud but there was something new that night. A friend noted to me at the end of the night that it’s the only opening night she could remember where all the chatter was about the play. 
 
People want to talk about Mad Forest
 
We want people to talk about Mad Forest. We always want people to talk about our productions. That’s one of the reasons we make the producing choice’s we make. It’s the reason we have the OpenForum discussion series, it’s the reason we have this blog. At Forum, the work doesn’t just happen on the stage, it happens in the audience. We always hope that the work on our stages leaves audiences with questions that they want to ask. Theatre is a questioning art. Since it happens both communally and individually, no theatrical experience is completely shared. 
 
The communal individualism is even clearer in our production of Mad Forest where seated in the round no audience member experiences the same thing. And then you have a playwright like Caryl Churchill who writes her plays to force the questions, not explain her own answers. She was quoted early in her career as saying:
 
“Playwrights don’t give answers, they ask questions...We need to find new questions, which may help us answer the old ones or make them unimportant and this means new subjects and new form.” (Churchill, 1960).  
 
In Mad Forest she lives up to her quote. The form and the subject both implore the audience to think, to question and to turn the questions inward. 
 
All of this is to say Mad Forest is the perfect OpenForum play. There’s one downside though: the play is long and the last metro leaves at 11:46pm.  This leaves under a half hour (leaving time to go to the restroom and walk to the metro) for an OpenForum discussion on our typical Thursday night OpenForum. Sure, some folks have cars, some folks bike and some folks live in Silver Spring. They can stay later and keep the discussion going. But I do none of those things. I need to catch that metro. I’ll be there though. I’ll be leading the OpenForum audience discussion sessions but they will be short. And we need more time - there are too many questions, too many thoughts, too many opportunities for audience members to connect to each other and to the work. 
 
So, OpenForum blog readers here I turn to you. I need your help trying to figure out the best way to turn our OpenForum discussions electronic. I want to find a way to have the discussions on the audiences own time. To let them get home, check in on the kids, get a drink, do whatever their routine is and still have the opportunity to check in, to ask their questions and to connect. 
 
The easiest option is asking people to comment on a blog entry like this one, or asking them to comment on a thread in facebook discussions. But neither of those options feel right to me (but don’t let that stop you from commenting below). Here’s why they don’t feel right: OpenForum is a safe space. When you are in one of those discussions it feels personal, private, what you say you are sharing only with the people right in front of you - they people who experienced the production with you that night. The internet? Not such a safe space. What you say will be there forever, anyone can read it. Though you can say things anonymously, you aren’t creating connections that way - and we all know that people who feel shy about sharing will not comment, which means important community voices are left unheard. 
 
So other options? Google+ Hangout? Would that make sense? It wouldn’t allow for people to join in on their own time, it would have to be scheduled. 
 
Here’s my thought: email. Simple and sweet. You want to participate? Send your email to me at hannah@forumtheatredc.org. For every five emails I get I will send out an email starting the conversation chain. If you participate, this means you will suddenly have a private conversation in your inbox with me (or other Forum company members) an four other audience members you may or may not know.  You can ask your questions and hear other people’s thoughts in a non-public space.  Plus, you can still make it home before midnight!
 
What do you think? Let us know below or by email. 
 
Want to participate? Send an email to hannah@forumtheatredc.org and in the subject line write “OpenForum.” Don’t want to share your real email? Create a fake one. It’s easy!
Comments (5)
Bookmark and Share
nmvlyjrg
Posted by uk payday loans on 04/06/12 | Reply
wlotmbo
Posted by cheap cialis on 03/28/12 | Reply
efqxngua
Posted by viagra on 03/15/12 | Reply
nkqdqid
Posted by cialis on 03/08/12 | Reply
I really enjoy your editorials,thanks for such informative and insightful reading
Posted by cartier tonneau on 03/05/12 | Reply
Add a comment

“You’re no Jesus”

Posted on September 25, 2011 in Mad Forest

Comments (1)
Bookmark and Share
I really enjoy your editorials,thanks for such informative and insightful reading
Posted by cartier santos watch on 03/05/12 | Reply
Add a comment

Before You See MAD FOREST

Posted on September 6, 2011 in Mad Forest

By Michael Dove, Mad Forest Director

 

For a play like Mad Forest, we've had to really immerse ourselves with the culture and historical details of 1989 Romania and the events that led to the Revolution and the aftermath of those few days that changed the whole country (though the debate of what changed very much fuels this play). 

The fact that this was not an easily-simplified event is, in part, what led Caryl Churchill (and director Mark Wing-Davey) to developing this script and what drew Forum and myself to the play. It is not a story that can be parsed into "who was against who and for what" terms. Add to that the extreme difference of Communist Romania of the 80's to the United States then and today. 

With the help of Dan Istrate, who grew up in Romania in the time of this play, we started our rehearsal process with as much information as possible so that everyone had a grounding in this unique period in history.

Before we begin performances and you come to see the show, I wanted to share some of the resources we are using to prepare that I think you'll find interesting.

 

4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days (4 luni, 3 saptamâni si 2 zile)

This movie, made in 2007, depicts a woman who helps her university roommate arrange an illegal abortion in 1987 Romania (the Ceaușescu outlawed abortions). This policy makes its way into Mad Forest's storyline as well as many other social aspects of the time period that the movie shows.

I think it's a really amazing film and you can watch it on Netflix streaming. Really worth checking out.

 

 

 

 

 

Romania's Revolution of 1989: An Enduring Enigma

This NYtimes article gives as exhaustive as an account of the events surrounding the Revolution in December of 1989.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Medical Care in Romania Comes at an Extra Cost


Another NYTimes article. This one talks about the enduring legacy of the culture of bribery and corruption within the medical community during Communist Romania that still affects citizens, today.

 

Comments (1)
Bookmark and Share
I watched 4months 3weeks 2days, and I have to say it was devastating. It is a beautifully paced piece, wrought with tension and vulnerability. I only hope we can capture the spirit and mood of the film with our production.
Posted by Joe Brack on 09/09/11 | Reply
Add a comment